Spm8Batch update beta channel - #96
Merged
dankessler merged 6 commits intoJul 30, 2012
Merged
Conversation
…ed to make any localization tweaks aside from manually sourcing spm8Setup or configuring spm8Setup to be automatically sourced for all or some users
…w, much more limited installation requirements
…re repository, if available
…ase tag from .local/mc_releasetag if available
Spm8 batch/localization automate
Spm8Batch/VersionLogging
Member
Author
|
I will consider this comment a pseudo +1 from @shijiaguo since she has actually been testing this code and not found any issues with the changes introduced. |
dankessler
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2012
Spm8Batch update beta channel
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updating spm8Batch_beta channel with stuff in spm8Batch_alpha. @shijiaguo has been using the alpha channel to actively test for a while, so I will consider that effectively a +1 for diff review and go ahead and merge it.
However, @rcwelsh may want to take a look at the diff and see how I've changed localization, logging, and especially documentation. Many of these changes ought not be included if @rcwelsh is planning to release this code independently.